Title: The Three "Wholes" of the Big Health Industry: A Comparative Analysis

The concept of the "three wholes" in the context of the big health industry is a significant aspect that deserves exploration. This article compares and contrasts the notions of the three "wholes" in both English and Chinese contexts, focusing on their relevance in the field of health care.

In the English-speaking world, the three "wholes" typically refer to "whole person," "whole population," and "whole society." These concepts are integral to the philosophy of the big health industry, which aims to provide comprehensive, holistic care that encompasses physical, mental, and social well-being. The "whole person" emphasizes the individual's unique needs and characteristics, the "whole population" focuses on preventing diseases and promoting wellness across all age groups and demographics, and the "whole society" emphasizes the collective responsibility to ensure access to quality health care for all.

在中文环境中，"三全"的概念也广泛应用于大健康产业。与英文中的"whole person," "whole population," 和 "whole society"相对应，"三全"指的是"全过程"、"全人群"和"全社会"。全过程关注健康管理和服务的过程，包括预防、治疗、康复和临终关怀等阶段。全人群强调的是关注各类人群的健康需求，特别是弱势群体的特殊需求。全社会则强调政府、企业、社区和个人等多元主体的共同参与和协作，以实现健康治理的现代化。

总体来说，尽管语言和文化背景存在差异，但英文和中文语境中对大健康产业中"三全"的理解和实践表现出相似之处。 Both English and Chinese perspectives recognize the importance of comprehensive, holistic health care that considers the individual, population, and society as a whole. The differences lie in the specific emphasis and implementation methods, reflecting cultural and social norms unique to each context. Therefore, it is essential for stakeholders in the big health industry to understand the local context and adapt their strategies accordingly to achieve optimal health outcomes.