为什么没有剑突

剑突，是一种古代战术，主要由投掷长矛和近战冲锋组成。它在古代战争中扮演了重要的角色，但是随着时间的推移，这项战术逐渐消失了。那么为什么现代战争中没有剑突呢？

首先，现代战争更加依赖先进的武器技术。随着科技的发展，人类创造出了各种强大的武器，如机枪、坦克和导弹等。这些武器可以在远距离上对敌人进行打击，使近战战术变得相对较少使用。剑突需要士兵们亲自接触到敌人才能起作用，而现代战争中，安全和远程打击成为主要考量。

其次，现代战争注重快速机动和灵活性。剑突战术需要士兵们密集地组织在一起，然后集体冲锋。这种战术在敌人精确的火力下非常脆弱，很容易受到大规模伤亡。现代战争中，士兵们更多地采用零散和小规模的战术行动，以增加机动性和灵活性。

此外，现代战争强调情报和侦察的重要性。在剑突时代，战斗往往是在近距离进行的，士兵们能够通过目测确定敌人的位置和意图。然而，在现代战争中，敌人可能使用隐蔽的手段进行伏击和诱导，士兵们需要依靠情报和侦察技术来获取可靠的信息。剑突战术在这方面相对较弱，无法有效地适应现代战争的情况。

最后，现代战争注重减少人员伤亡。剑突战术往往造成双方都有大量伤亡的结果。而现代战争倾向于最小化人员伤亡，更多地依赖技术手段来打击敌人。这是因为现代社会对生命价值的重视和人道主义的进步。因此，剑突战术在这一点上与现代战争的目标不相符。

总之，尽管剑突是一项古老而有效的战术，但它在现代战争中渐渐消失是由于多方面的原因。现代战争更依赖于先进的武器技术、快速机动和灵活性、情报和侦察以及减少人员伤亡等因素.这使得剑突战术无法适应现代战争的需求和环境。

Why there are no more pike and shot

Pike and shot, an ancient military tactic, consisted of troops armed with both long spears and firearms in close combat. It played a crucial role in warfare in the past, but over time, this tactic has disappeared. So why is pike and shot no longer used in modern warfare?

Firstly, modern warfare relies heavily on advanced weapon technology. With the advancement of technology, humans have created powerful weapons such as machine guns, tanks, and missiles. These weapons can strike enemies from a distance, reducing the need for close combat tactics. Pike and shot required soldiers to engage in hand-to-hand combat, whereas modern warfare prioritizes safety and long-range strikes.

Secondly, modern warfare emphasizes quick maneuverability and flexibility. Pike and shot tactics required soldiers to gather closely together and charge collectively. This tactic was vulnerable to accurate enemy firepower and prone to massive casualties. In modern warfare, soldiers tend to engage in dispersed and small-scale tactical operations to increase maneuverability and flexibility.

Moreover, intelligence and reconnaissance play a critical role in modern warfare. During the pike and shot era, battles were often fought at close range, allowing soldiers to visually determine the location and intentions of enemies. However, in modern warfare, enemies may employ concealed methods for ambush and deception, requiring soldiers to rely on intelligence and reconnaissance technologies for reliable information. Pike and shot tactics are relatively weak in this aspect and cannot effectively adapt to the conditions of modern warfare.

Lastly, modern warfare aims to minimize casualties. Pike and shot tactics often resulted in heavy casualties for both sides. Modern warfare tends to minimize personnel losses, relying more on technological means to strike enemies. This is due to the increased value placed on human life and humanitarian progress in modern society. Therefore, pike and shot tactics do not align with the goals of modern warfare.

In conclusion, while pike and shot were ancient and effective tactics, their disappearance from modern warfare can be attributed to various factors. Modern warfare relies more on advanced weapon technology, quick maneuverability and flexibility, intelligence and reconnaissance, as well as minimizing personnel casualties. These factors render pike and shot tactics inadequate and incompatible with the demands and environment of modern warfare.