邹恒甫现在怎么样

邹恒甫，这位在经济学领域曾经引起诸多关注和争议的人物，如今的状况如何呢？

邹恒甫出生于 1962 年，是湖南人。他早年在学术上取得了显著成就，1982 年毕业于武汉大学经济系，1989 年获哈佛大学经济学博士，成为 1949 年以来首位进入哈佛大学经济系并获得该校经济学博士学位的中国大陆学生。

然而，邹恒甫的一些行为和言论也曾引发了广泛的讨论和争议。比如他曾炮轰北大，这一事件引起了社会的极大关注。当时，他的爆料方式以及内容都引发了众多争议。有人认为他可能是出于报复心理，因为他曾被北大光华管理学院不续聘。但也有人认为，如果他有真凭实据，那么这种爆料也是为了揭示一些问题。

在学术方面，邹恒甫在经济学领域有着一定的影响力。但随着时间的推移，以及大量留学归来的经济学人才的涌现，他在学术领域的地位和影响力或许也在发生着变化。

如今，邹恒甫可能依然在经济学的研究和教学领域继续努力着，但他的具体活动和最新研究成果可能并不为大众所熟知。或许他在默默地为学术发展贡献着自己的力量，也或许他在调整自己的研究方向和策略，以适应不断变化的学术环境和社会需求。

In English:

How is Zou Hengfu Now

Zou Hengfu, a figure who has attracted much attention and controversy in the field of economics, how is he now?

Zou Hengfu was born in 1962 and is from Hunan Province. He achieved remarkable academic achievements in his early years. He graduated from the Department of Economics of Wuhan University in 1982 and obtained a Ph.D. in economics from Harvard University in 1989, becoming the first mainland Chinese student to enter the Department of Economics at Harvard University and obtain a Ph.D. from there since 1949.

However, some of Zou Hengfu's actions and remarks have also sparked widespread discussions and controversies. For example, his attack on Peking University once attracted great social attention. At that time, both his way of revealing information and the content caused many disputes. Some people thought that he might be out of revenge because he was not re-employed by the Guanghua School of Management of Peking University. But others believed that if he had solid evidence, then this kind of revelation was also to expose some problems.

In the academic field, Zou Hengfu has a certain influence in the field of economics. But as time goes by, and with the emergence of a large number of returned overseas students in economics, his position and influence in the academic field may also be changing.

Today, Zou Hengfu may still be continuing to work hard in the field of economics research and teaching, but his specific activities and the latest research results may not be well known to the public. Maybe he is silently contributing to the development of academia, or maybe he is adjusting his research direction and strategy to adapt to the constantly changing academic environment and social needs.